Tag Archives: Supreme Court

S’Court warns against ‘unwarranted’ attacks on judiciary.

The Supreme Court on Saturday slammed Nigerians venting venomous comments on the judiciary following its recent judgements which affirmed former Governor of the Akwa Ibom State, Godswill Akpabio, and Senate President, Ahmad Lawan, as APC senatorial candidates in February 25 elections.

The recent affirmation of Akpabio and Lawan by the apex court had generated varied concerns from Nigerians, with some branding the judiciary as irresponsible and corrupt.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

A Nigeria-born Professor based in America, Farooq Kperogi, had particularly written a combative article to condemn the judiciary over the pronouncements.

However, in a statement titled “Be mindful of unwarranted attacks on judicial officers” and issued by the Director of Press And Information in Supreme Court, Festus Akande, the Apex Court warned Nigerians against attacks on the judiciary especially the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Olukayode Ariwoola.

Akande noted that over 600 cases had so far gone to court from just party primaries which were conducted by political parties without any interference from any external bodies.

He said the indecently unhealthy conduct of the political parties in the country resulted in the judiciary having to deal with more cases than necessary.

The statement read: “We have watched with utter dismay some unfortunate events that have been unfolding in the country, particularly within the political landscape, for some days now.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

“It is so disheartening to learn that some individuals and groups of persons who ought to know better and even assume the revered positions of role models to a larger proportion of the citizens are now sadly, the very ones flagrantly displaying ignorance and infantilism in the course of defending the indefensible.

“In an ineptly scripted toxic article, one Farooq Adamu Kperogi, who described himself as a Nigerian-American Professor, decided to plunge into an abysmal pit of irredeemable ignorance by venting convoluted anger on Supreme Court Justices with a view to pleasing his paymasters.

“We have made it abundantly clear on different occasions that Judicial Officers are neither political office holders nor politicians that should be dressed in such robes. Our silence must not be mistaken for weakness or cowardice.

“Certainly, every Nigerian citizen has an inalienable right to express his or her opinion without any encumbrance; but even in the course of expressing such fundamental right, we should be circumspect enough to observe the caution gate of self-control in order not to infringe on another person’s right.

“Even in a state of emotional disequilibrium, we should be reasonable enough to make a good choice of decent words, as every word employed by the pen-happy Kperogi only succeeded in portraying the kind of vacuum that sign-posts all that he has as academic accomplishment.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

“Courts don’t advertise or scout for cases for adjudication; but at the same time, we are duty-bound to adjudicate on all matters that come before us with a view to giving justice to whoever justice is due, irrespective of status. No court in any clime is a Father Christmas; so, no one can get what he or she didn’t ask for.

Read Also: Supreme Court affirms Emenike as APC governorship candidate in Abia

“Similarly, all matters are thoroughly analysed and considered based on their merits and not the faces that appear in Court or sentiments that attempt to becloud the sense of reasoning. “So, for anyone in his or her right frame of mind to insinuate that the Justices have been bought over by some unknown and unseen persons is, to say the least, a bizarre expression of ignorance, which definitely has no place in law or even in the realm of pedestrian reasoning.

“We are not surprised with the surge of these well-orchestrated verbal assaults on Judicial Officers across the country at this period of elections. It is a thing we are used to and are ever ready to absorb whatever comes our way, but there should be some level of decorum and dignity in what we say and do. Politics should not be played without recourse to good conscience and acceptable moral conduct, as everything is evolving globally.

“Calling on the Chief Justice of Nigeria to resign or attacking Justices that sit on various panels, as exhibited by a faceless group that calls itself ‘Progressive Minds Forum,’ is rather prosaic. If political parties fail to organise themselves well by managing their internal wrangling maturely and now chose to bring themselves to the court, we are duty-bound to adjudicate in accordance with the provisions of the law and not the dictates of any individual or deity, as some people would want us to do.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

“If political parties conduct themselves well and orderly too, the courts would definitely handle fewer cases and the political atmosphere will be much healthier than it is currently.

“We shall continuously do our best to discharge our constitutional responsibility to keep the country together and move the nation along the path of peace, progress and development. Attacks by groups, political parties or individuals under any guise will not deter us, rather it will boost our resolve to do more for the country.

“It is not only petty but equally very unreasonable for anyone to hurriedly link CJN Ariwoola to his state of origin and tribe simply because of a particular judgment of the court.

“The major problem of Nigeria has always been the undue emphasis on religion and ethnicity in all our dealings. As long as we continue along that path, progress will remain a mirage. As of this moment, over 600 cases have so far gone to court from just party primaries which were conducted by political parties without any encumbrance or interference from any external bodies.

— Sign Up For 𝕹𝖔𝖇𝖑𝖊 𝕽𝖊𝖕𝖔𝖗𝖙𝖊𝖗𝖘 𝕸𝖊𝖉𝖎𝖆 —

Global Coverage Newsletter

Global Economy, Politics, Business, Education, Multiculturalism, Geopolitical Rise — we bring you the stories that matter.

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy

“So, will the political parties, Kperogi or any individual now accuse the court of causing such unpleasant intra-party wrangling that defied all internal conflict resolution mechanisms? Most times, some people try as much as possible to disingenuously stand logic on its head to show their level of unimaginable dexterity.

“Those who have cultivated the unfashionable penchant of always attacking the Judiciary over every judgment or ruling given should better have a rethink and start channelling such robust energy into some ventures that are more developmental than destructive.



“We are not politicians and should not, by any stroke of imagination, be cast in that mould either. Nobody’s interest can ever supersede the interest of everybody. Nigeria is bigger than every one of us. A word is enough for the wise.”

Advertisement

Naira Redesign: You’re bound to obey Court judgement – Falana warns CBN.

Foremost human rights activist, Femi Falana, SAN, has disclosed why the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, must comply with the Supreme Court order regarding the currency swap crisis.

Falana, in a statement on Thursday, said the apex bank should not fall for the reports and opinions indicating that it could ignore the Supreme Court’s judgement restraining it from enforcing the ban on the old Naira notes.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

In his statement titled, “Why CBN Must Obey Ex Parte Order Of Supreme Court”, he highlighted many cases supporting the court’s decision.

He asked CBN and its management to allow the judgement to run its entire course in the interim, pending an order of dismissal filed by the Federal Government.

Falana warned doing otherwise would spell doom and chaos for the country.


more on AFRICA
————————————–


“In the interim, the Federal Government of Nigeria and its agencies, including the Central Bank of Nigeria, are bound by the valid and subsisting ex parte order of the Supreme Court of Nigeria until it is set aside by the same court. The alternative is to compound the ongoing anarchy and chaos in the land,” he said

Wike hails Supreme Court’s ruling on old naira notes, to join suit.

The Rivers State Governor, Nyesom Wike, has applauded the Supreme Court over its ruling which temporarily stopped the Federal Government from ending the use of the old naira notes as legal tender on February 10.

Supreme Court on Wednesday restrained the federal government and Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) from effecting the February 10 deadline for withdrawal of the old banknotes from circulation.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

The apex bank delivered the ruling on an application filed by Governors Nasir El-Rufai (Kaduna), Yahaya Bello (Kogi), and Bello Matawalle (Zamfara).

In the ruling, the seven-member panel of the Supreme Court led by Justice John Okoro held that the old Naira notes would remain legal tender until the determination of the suit on February 15.

Wike, who spoke at the Rivers Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) campaign rally held at County State School in Emilaghan, Abua/Odual local government area of the state, said the ruling would save the masses of the country, and promised to join the suit challenging the CBN’s policy.

READ ALSO: Wike gives PDP go-ahead to use Port Harcourt stadium for campaign rally

He said: “I want to on behalf of the Rivers State government commend the Nigerian Supreme Court for what they have done today to save the masses of this country and to save democracy.

“Today, the Supreme Court has restrained the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) from embarking on stopping the old Nigerian Naira notes from circulating.

— Sign Up For 𝕹𝖔𝖇𝖑𝖊 𝕽𝖊𝖕𝖔𝖗𝖙𝖊𝖗𝖘 𝕸𝖊𝖉𝖎𝖆 —

Global Coverage Newsletter

Global Economy, Politics, Business, Education, Multiculturalism, Geopolitical Rise — we bring you the stories that matter.

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy

“And let me commend my brother states — Kogi, Kaduna, and Zamfara — who took it upon themselves to go and challenge the federal government at the Supreme Court.

“I also want to say that the Rivers State government will join them in that suit to challenge what the CBN is doing. We will not support anything that will go against the masses, anything that makes the masses suffer.



“I have said before, this democracy can only survive with the support of INEC, security agencies, and the judiciary. With what happened today, the supreme court has shown that the hope of the common man lies in the judiciary.”

S’Court’s ruling on naira swap saved Nigeria from anarchy — Tinubu.

The All Progressives Congress (APC) presidential candidate, Bola Tinubu, on Wednesday hailed the Supreme Court over its ruling on the naira redesign.

A seven-member panel of the apex court had earlier on Wednesday restrained the Federal Government and the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) from going ahead with the February 10 deadline for the withdrawal of the old naira notes from circulation was discussed by the two leaders.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

The court delivered the ruling in an application filed by Governors Nasir El-Rufai (Kaduna), Yahaya Bello (Kogi), and Bello Matawalle (Zamfara).

The court also adjourned the case to February 15, 2023.

Tinubu, who reacted to the judgement in a statement issued by the Director of Media and Publicity in the APC Presidential Campaign Council, Bayo Omanuga, said the ruling saved Nigeria from anarchy.

READ ALSO: NAIRA SWAP: Supreme Court cancels CBN’s Feb 10 deadline

The former Lagos State governor charged the Nigerian government to revise the policy in the interest of Nigerians.

He also commended the three APC governors who took the matter to the apex court, saying he was in the presidential race to make life better for Nigerians.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

The statement read: “I want to salute the courage of our governors and most especially the progressives governors in APC who acted to save our country from avoidable and dangerous political crises and social unrest which the central bank policy on new naira notes has brought on our country,”

“Our country was dangerously careering toward anarchy and political and economic shutdown. But with the Supreme Court interim ruling, our country has been pulled back from the precipice.

“We thank our Supreme Court justices for ruling wisely on the side of the people who have been subjected to undue agony and pains since this policy was announced.

“The federal government and relevant stakeholders can now sit down and work out a better framework on how to proceed with the new policy without causing any social and economic disruption and inconvenience to our people. We have examples of other countries that have successfully and seamlessly changed their currencies to learn from.



“Those countries give a long time, at least 12 months to effect the currency change. They do not engage in CBN-like Fire Brigade approach.”

Dismiss Suit Challenging Old Naira Notes, FG Tells Court.

The Federal Government has asked the Supreme Court to dismiss a suit challenging the February 10 deadline for the circulation of old naira notes.

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), which redesigned the naira, had fixed January 31 as the deadline of the old notes to be legal tender.


But the deadline was extended to February 10 after intense pressure on the government and the apex bank.

— Sign Up For 𝕹𝖔𝖇𝖑𝖊 𝕽𝖊𝖕𝖔𝖗𝖙𝖊𝖗𝖘 𝕸𝖊𝖉𝖎𝖆 —

Global Coverage Newsletter

Global Economy, Politics, Business, Education, Multiculturalism, Geopolitical Rise — we bring you the stories that matter.

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy

‘Extend timeframe for naira redesign implementation’, Governors write Buhari

Tinubu hails govs over S/Court ruling on CBN’s naira swap policy

Last week, Godwin Emefiele said the apex bank was not considering extending the deadline.

The All Progressives Congress (APC) Governors had met with President Buhari over the issue and the president asked them to give him seven days to look into it.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

But the governments of Kaduna, Kogi, and Zamfara states headed for the court to challenge the CBN.

In its ruling on Wednesday, a seven-member panel led by Justice John Okoro halted the Federal Government’s move.

The apex court ordered commercial banks and other financial institutions to continue transacting with the old notes pending the determination of the motion at the apex court on February 15.

In a preliminary objection filed on Wednesday through his lawyers, Mahmud Magaji and Tijanni Gazali, the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) argued that the Supreme Court lacked the jurisdiction to entertain the matter.

The AGF contended that the plaintiffs have equally not shown reasonable cause of action against the defendant.



Reports of the objection got to the media hours after Buhari, Emefiele and Malami met at Aso Rock over the naira redesign issue

Reasons Supreme Court cancels CBN’s February 10 deadline.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday restrained the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Federal Government have from effecting the February 10, 2023 deadline to phase out the old Naira notes.

In a ruling delivered by a seven-man panel of the Supreme Court led by Justice John Okoro, granted an ex parte application that the old Naira notes will remain a legal tender until a final decision has been made on the suit brought to the court by three northern states; Kaduna, Kogi and Zamfara.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

Recall with 𝕹𝖔𝖇𝖑𝖊 𝕽𝖊𝖕𝖔𝖗𝖙𝖊𝖗𝖘 𝕸𝖊𝖉𝖎𝖆 that the CBN had redesigned the N200, N500 and N1,000 banknotes, and released the new currencies in December 2022.

The financial regulator also informed Nigerians that the old Naira notes would cease to be legal starting from January 31, 2023, but it later extended the deadline to February 10, 2023.

Kaduna, Kogi and Zamfara governments dragged the CBN and FG to court over the impact of the transition from old Naira to the new Naira notes.

Through their counsel, AbdulHakeem Uthman Mustapha (SAN), they asked the Surpreme Court to intervene as the deadline would increase the hardship of persons living within the three states.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

They applied for an interim injunction through an ex-parte motion to temporarily halt the CBN and Nigerian commercial banks from enforcing the deadline to phase out the old Naira

Mustapha told the court that, “Unless this Honourable Court intervenes, the Government and people of Kaduna, Kogi and Zamfara State will continue to go through a lot of hardship and would ultimately suffer great loss as a result of the insufficient and unreasonable time within which the Federal Government is embarking on the ongoing currency redesign policy.”

The three states argued that their residents have deposited their money to the banks as directed by the central bank, but there’s insufficient of new Naira notes to meet the demands of their citizens.

They said the 10 days extension of the deadline is not enough to cushion the chaos and hardship the Naira redesign policy has caused their residents, as they are still unable to access their money to finance their daily activities.



The court granted their request to temporarily halt the CBN deadline, and the case was adjourned to February 15, 2023

Naira swap: Supreme court suspends CBN’s February 10 deadline.

The Supreme Court of Nigeria has restrained the Federal Government from continuing with the full implementation of the demonetization policy.

Three northern states, Kaduna, Kogi and Zamfara, had, in a motion ex-parte filed on February 3rd, prayed the apex court to halt the Central Bank of Nigeria’s naira redesign policy.

A 7-man panel of the Supreme Court led by Justice John Okoro, in a unanimous ruling, granted an interim injunction restraining the FG, CBN, commercial banks etc, from implementing the February 10 deadline for the old 200, 500 and 1000 Naira notes to stop being a legal tender.



The court further held that the FG, CBN, and commercial banks must not continue with the deadline pending the determination of a notice on notice in respect of the issue on February 15.
By the ruling, the old Naira notes continue to be legal tenders in Nigeria.

Lawan vs Machina: Supreme court judgement sparks controversies.

The Supreme Court on Monday restored the Senate President, Ahmad Ibrahim Lawan as the Senatorial candidate of the All Progressives Congress, APC, for Yobe North Senatorial District.

In a split judgement of three to two, the apex court affirmed Lawan as the authentic Senatorial candidate of the APC in Yobe North Senatorial district.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

The apex court, in the majority judgement, voided and set aside the decisions of the Federal High Court and the Court of Appeal, which had affirmed Bashir Sheriff Machina as the APC candidate, having won the party’s primary election held on May 28, 2022.

Justice Centus Chima Nweze, who delivered the majority judgement of the Apex Court, held that Machina ought to have commenced his case at the Federal High Court with a writ of summons given the grievous allegations in his suit against the defendants.

However, Justices Adamu Jauro and Emmanuel Akomaye Agim disagreed with the majority judgement.

They held that the Federal High Court and the Court of Appeal were correct in their findings, which affirmed Machina as the authentic candidate.

The two Justices held that Machina was lawfully nominated because the primary election of May 28, 2022, which produced him, was lawfully conducted in line with the provisions of the law.

Justices Jauro and Agim further insisted that APC conducted an unlawful primary election as the May 28 primary election was not cancelled before June 9, 2022, which purportedly produced Lawan, describing it as illegal and a breach of section 285 of the 1999 Constitution.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

Lawan hails judgement as victory for democracy.

Reacting to the judgement, Lawan said the decision was a victory for the APC in Yobe, the entire country and democracy. His statement was contained in a post via his verified Twitter handle.

He said, “The Supreme Court Judgement of today on the disputed All Progressives Congress (APC) Yobe North Senatorial ticket in the February 25 National Assembly is a victory for all APC in Yobe, generally for APC across the country and democracy.

“What happened was democracy at work. The lower courts gave their various judgements, and the Supreme Court gave the final judgement.

“I want to commend the Supreme Court and, in fact, the judiciary for delivering this kind of judgement to strengthen our democracy.”

Lawan’s Supreme Court victory, daylight robbery – Machina

However, Nura Audu, a Deputy Campaign Coordinator, Yobe North Zone, for the Bashir Machina campaign team, described the judgement as devastating to anyone committed to justice and fairness.

Audu, a staunch supporter of Machina, also said the judgement was unprecedented and unfortunate in the political history of Nigeria.

“The Supreme Court judgement was a daylight robbery and very unfortunate in the political history of Nigeria.

“Ahmed Lawan neither obtained and filled the Senatorial aspiration form nor contested in the primaries,” he told newsmen.

Other reactions

Meanwhile, in a terse statement via his Twitter handle, former Nigerian lawmaker, Senator Shehu Sani noted that the forces against fair elections in the country were not giving up anytime soon.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

“It’s glaring that the forces against fair elections are unrelenting. We must all be vigilant for democracy if we really want this election to be credible,” he tweeted.

Speaking to 𝕹𝖔𝖇𝖑𝖊 𝕽𝖊𝖕𝖔𝖗𝖙𝖊𝖗𝖘’ known Media, a renowned scholar and Director of the Abuja School of Social and Political Thoughts, Dr Sam Amadi expressed surprise at the decision of the Supreme Court.

Amadi said it would undermine the growth of political parties and further damage participation in politics.

He further argued that the judgement has implications for the nation’s democracy as it would further judicialize politics and create a situation where it looks like it is judges who determine who rules, not the electorates.

”I am surprised at the decision by the Supreme Court but will reserve my full comments until I read through the judgement. But I am worried that the decision seems to have nullified the most important innovation of the new electoral law, which is to make party primaries more democratic.

“The decision seems to suggest that whoever the party leader wants, they can impose as a candidate whether the person won primaries or not.

”Basically, there is no need to be scrupulous about managing free and fair primaries. Just manage the party leaders, and you get what you want. This will undermine the growth of political parties and further damage participation in politics. I also read that the Supreme Court also based the decision on the technicality of the mode of originating the suit. It is very tragic that such a far-reaching decision is made for mere technicality.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

”The implication of the judgement for democracy is that it further judicializes politics and creates a situation where it looks like it is unelected judges who determine who rules, not the electorates. It builds on the decisions in the Amaechi, Uzodinma and Akpabio cases to create a high sense of frustration about the prospect of democracy consolidation,” Amadi said.

Also speaking to 𝕹𝖔𝖇𝖑𝖊 𝕽𝖊𝖕𝖔𝖗𝖙𝖊𝖗𝖘’ known Media, the President of the Civil Rights Realisation and Advancement Network (CRRAN), Olu Omotayo, faulted the judgement.

Omotayo said it might affect transparency in the conduct of party primaries, noting that it is not going to contribute to the development of party politics in Nigeria.

He expressed worry that anybody could wake up, put his name on the list, and submit it to INEC.

”When you look at the judgement, you can see that not all the justices in the five-man panel agreed; they did not agree on a point. It was three against two. I feel that the position of the minority led by Justice Adamu should have been the position because the decision by the majority led by Justice Nweze is based on technicality.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

”The Supreme Court sacrificed substantial justice for technicality because, at the lower Court, it was glaring that somebody did not contest the primary; there was no dispute that Lawan did not contest that primary; he was busy contesting for the presidential primaries, which he lost. He was not part of that primary. The primary was conducted. APC thereafter went and conducted another primary, which INEC did not supervise.

“When you look at the fact, it was very glaring. The Supreme Court said he was supposed to commence it with a writ of summon where they will call in witnesses and give evidence.

“It is just based on mere technicality. It is not good for our democracy. This is a developing democracy. If you want people to believe in democracy, you must be able to carry the people along. So it is not just making the law or following technicalities, but you must be able to do substantial justice so that people can have confidence in the system,” he said.

Omotayo, a legal luminary, also feared there would be no true democracy regarding party politics, saying people would lose interest.

”The implication of the lead judgement is that it affects transparency in the party primary election. This other decision is not going to contribute to the development of party politics in Nigeria. It means anybody can just wake up, put his name on the list, and submit it to INEC.

“It will definitely affect party politics; there will be no proper democracy when it comes to party politics. People will lose interest.

— Sign Up For 𝕹𝖔𝖇𝖑𝖊 𝕽𝖊𝖕𝖔𝖗𝖙𝖊𝖗𝖘 𝕸𝖊𝖉𝖎𝖆 —

Global Coverage Newsletter

Global Economy, Politics, Business, Education, Multiculturalism, Geopolitical Rise — we bring you the stories that matter.

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy

”It will also affect the confidence of the people in the democratic system because when you look at the minority judgement, these are learned justices also; they were of the view that what APC did was contrary to the Electoral Act, somebody that did not partake in the election you are submitting his name to the INEC.

”When you are talking about democracy, it is from the party. You practise democracy from the party. So where people vote, waste time, conduct primaries, and people vote for somebody, and you now say that it is someone that did not even contest the election that will represent the people, there is no justifiable reason whatsoever to make such a decision.



“I align myself with the sound reasoning of the two Justices of the Supreme Court who said no, this is not proper. So it is not a proper decision,” he said.

Supreme Court’s ruling on Edo crisis.

The Supreme Court on February 1 resolved the crisis in the Edo State chapter of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in favour of a faction loyal to Governor Godwin Obaseki.

The apex court delivered the ruling in an appeal filed by a lawmaker representing the Oredo Federal Constituency in the House of Representatives, Omoregie Ogbeide-Ihama.

Justice Centus Nweze, who delivered the lead judgment, said Ogbeide-Ihama’s appeal was dismissed on the ground that the issues he raised did not form part of the judgment of the Court of Appeal which he had appealed.



He said: “Any ground of appeal that does not challenge issues raised at the lower court is incompetent. I enter judgment in favour of the respondents.”

Anxiety as S’Court decides PDP’s fate in Taraba.

Tension is high in Taraba State as members of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, await Supreme Court judgement on the party’s guber candidate.

𝕹𝖔𝖇𝖑𝖊 𝕽𝖊𝖕𝖔𝖗𝖙𝖊𝖗𝖘 𝕸𝖊𝖉𝖎𝖆 learnt that the judgement will be delivered today, Friday.

This is coming a few days after the same court nullified the governorship primary election conducted by the All Progressives Congress, APC.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

One of the PDP governorship aspirants, Professor Jerome Nyameh had approached the apex court after the Appeal Court voided his suit against the PDP gubernatorial candidate, Kefas Agbu, on the grounds that he (Agbu) did not purchase the expression of interest and nomination forms.

He argued through his counsel, Pius D. Pius that the candidate was the party’s State chairman, whom he said presided over the screening of some aspirants jostling for various elective positions on the platform of the party.

At the time of filing this report, palpable tension has enveloped the camps of both Agbu and Nyameh.



Some of their supporters, who spoke to 𝕹𝖔𝖇𝖑𝖊 𝕽𝖊𝖕𝖔𝖗𝖙𝖊𝖗𝖘’ known Media, said they would accept the outcome of the judgement in good faith.

Court dismisses PDP’s suit against Oyetola’s participation in Osun guber election.

The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed an appeal by the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, seeking to restore the nullification of the participation of Osun State’s former Governor, Gboyega Oyetola, and his Deputy, Benedict Alabi, in the July 16, 2022 governorship election.

Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court in Abuja had, in a judgment on September 30, 2022, nullified the participation of Oyetola and Alabi in the governorship election on the grounds that their nomination forms were endorsed by an acting Chairman of APC, who was also a serving Governor of Yobe State, Mai Mala Buni.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

Justice Nwite’s judgment was set aside by the Court of Appeal, Abuja in a judgment in December last year, a decision the PDP appealed to the Supreme Court.

In a judgment on Thursday morning, a five-member panel of the Supreme Court, led by Justice Centus Nweze, held that the appeal by the PDP was without merit and directed the lawyer to the PDP, Kehinde Ogunwumiju (SAN), to withdraw it.

The court held that the PDP could not, under the law, question the process leading to the emergence of Oyetola and Alabi as candidates of the APC in the election.



Benue APC guber: Barnabas Gemade heads to Supreme Court.

The senator representing the Benue North East constituency, Barnabas Gemade, has disclosed that he is proceeding to the Supreme Court to challenge the case of the Appeal Court, Makurdi Division which struck out his suit challenging the gubernatorial primary election of the All Progressives Congress, APC, that produced Hyacinth Alia as its candidate.

Gemade disclosed this in a statement issued by his media aide, Solo Dzuah, after consultations with his legal team on the need to pursue the case to its logical conclusion.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

According to the former lawmaker, the main issues he raised in his suit and subsequent prayers were not addressed at the appeal court.

He expressed confidence in the judiciary as a system that guarantees justice and hope for the common man through diligent adjudication and interpretation of the law.

He also reiterated the justification for his legal actions as a loyal party man, and fully recognized aspirant for APC Benue State governorship primaries who feel short-changed by the alleged manipulation of the nomination process.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

Gemade concluded that his decision remains the only option to sanitize the electoral system and reposition the integrity of internal democracy which the state yearns for.



Taraba: Court reserves judgement for PDP guber tussle till Feb 3rd.

At last, a date for the Supreme Court to lay to rest the controversies surrounding the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship tussle for Taraba State has been fixed.

The wrangling which is between an aggrieved guber aspirant, Professor Jerome Nyameh and the party’s governorship flag bearer, Kefas Agbu, as well as the Party and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), 𝕹𝖔𝖇𝖑𝖊 𝕽𝖊𝖕𝖔𝖗𝖙𝖊𝖗𝖘 𝕸𝖊𝖉𝖎𝖆 learned will be resolved on the 3rd of February 2023.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

The case which was slated for hearing, Monday, at the Apex court led to the withdrawal of an appeal earlier filed by the former Speaker of the State House of Assembly, Joseph Albasu, seeking to be joined in the appeal filed by Nyameh.

The lawyer to the former speaker reportedly withdrew his appeal as an interested party and the PDP did same.

Recall that the Appellate court sitting in Yola, Adamawa state, had earlier dismissed both Nyameh’s cases on the grounds of lack of merits.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

Not comfortable with the appellate court’s decision, Nyameh, who believed that his case had merit, immediately proceeded to the Apex court, calling for the disqualification of the party’s governorship.

Two justices at the appellate court gave a majority judgement, affirming Agbu the candidate of PDP.

The judges, in their ruling, upheld the decision of the Federal High Court in Jalingo that it was a party affair and that the appeal court lacked jurisdiction to entertain it, ruling that Nyameh’s appeal lacked merit.

One of the judges, however, disagreed with the two other judges, ruling that Nyameh’s appeal had merit.

Watch Video Here || Download Video Here

Advertisements

READ ALSO:

The judge who did not only order for fresh primaries, in his ruling, also ordered that Agbu be excluded from participating in the fresh primaries.

Kicking against the majority judgement, Nyameh challenged the ruling at the court, relying on the minority judgement of the appellate court which held that “Agbu and PDP clearly violated their constitution and guidelines.”

At the time of filing this report, the chieftains of the party and the supporters of the two major actors declined to speak on the new development saying, “we will only comment after the ruling which has been slated for the 3rd of February this year.”



Supreme Court orders retrial of Ogun PDP governorship legal battle.

Advertisements

The Supreme Court on Monday in Abuja ordered that the legal action which arose on the conduct of the primary election of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, for the nomination of the governorship candidate in Ogun State be retried by the Federal High Court in Abuja.

Watch Video Here | Download Video Here

Justice Ibrahim Saulawa in a judgment delivered held that it was wrong of the Federal High Court in Abuja to have declined jurisdiction when in actual fact the constitution of the country conferred jurisdiction on it.

In a unanimous judgment of a five-man panel of the apex court, it was ordered that the suit be returned to the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court for reassignment to another judge.

Advertisements

| RECOMMENDED


Advertisements

Justice Saulawa upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal in Abuja which had earlier directed that the suit be heard afresh by another judge.

The apex court ordered that the suit be expeditiously heard and fully determined within the time allowed by law.

Watch Video Here | Download Video Here

Justice Taiwo Taiwo of the Federal High Court in Abuja had declined to entertain the suit filed by Jimmy Adebisi Lawal on the ground that it was an internal affair of the PDP.

Advertisements

Join our telegram news channel — Click Here »

Click Here »Join our WhatsApp news group

Follow us on FacebookClick Here »

Click Here »Follow us on Twitter

Like us on YouTubeClick Here »

Advertisements

PROFITABLE FOREX, BITCOIN AND BINARY TRADER. Do you require the service of a tested, trusted and experienced trader who can help you trade your online Forex, Bitcoin and Binary accounts for minimum 10-20% weekly profit?. Click here for details www.standfx.com, WhatsApp: +2348030797998

URGENT NEWS: Nigerians can now earn in US Dollars from home, let’s show you how our client earned $13,000 (₦9,600,000.00) on a premium domain name within 2 weeks of acquisition. Click here

Advertisements

Lawyer demands constitutional amendment to increase number of judges in High, Supreme Court.

Advertisements

Kayode Ajulo, a constitutional lawyer, has called for a constitutional amendment to increase the number of judges in both Supreme and High Courts.

The number of Judges addressing cases in these courts were inadequate for a country like Nigeria, Mr Ajulo opined.

Watch Video Here | Download Video Here

He said the length of time judges sit to decide cases could affect their health status and have grave implications on efficiency.

The legal practitioner said this while speaking with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Abuja on Sunday, stating that cases must be dispensed off as and when due.

He said the call became necessary against the backdrop of lingering cases in court, adding that the power lied with the National Assembly through constitutional amendment.

Mr Ajulo said, ” at the Supreme Court, if you check the number of judges there, I do not think they are up to 15, meanwhile all the cases from the whole federation end at the apex court.

“We should consider that age is not also on their side, because most of them are 60 years and you want to compile cases for them at that age.

“Today at the Supreme Court, some cases are adjourned to 2023 or 2024 and it’s not their fault.”

The legal practitioner said the number of Judges in Federal High Courts is around 75, adding that the number can be increased to 150 or 200.

“A city like Abuja having FCT High Court judges between 30 or 40, I do not see a reason why Abuja should not have something like 60 to 70 judges.

Advertisements

| RECOMMENDED


Advertisements

“I am a practising lawyer and you need to see what happens in court, you get to the court, you will see 10 to 15 cases whereas averagely, a case will take nothing less than an hour.

“And you need to see a case where Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SAN) is addressing the court; some of them spend six hours, then how many hours is left in court.

“The court will be tired and your case will not be heard, that is why we have so much number of cases in court with snail movement.

“Sometimes I pity them, even their remuneration is not commensurate with the nature of the job they do. Though, we learnt some people had gone to court that their remunerations be increased.”

Mr Ajulo said if the information was true, the President did the needful by increasing their remunerations, adding that the court action canvassing increment was not the right thing to do.

Watch Video Here | Download Video Here

He said that judges had to be well remunerated based on the amount of cases they attend to daily.

On Friday, President Muhammadu Buhari directed that a new enhanced salary structure be implemented for judicial officers

Advertisements

Join our telegram news channel — Click Here »

Click Here »Join our WhatsApp news group

Follow us on FacebookClick Here »

Click Here »Follow us on Twitter

Like us on YouTubeClick Here »

Advertisements

PROFITABLE FOREX, BITCOIN AND BINARY TRADER. Do you require the service of a tested, trusted and experienced trader who can help you trade your online Forex, Bitcoin and Binary accounts for minimum 10-20% weekly profit?. Click here for details www.standfx.com, WhatsApp: +2348030797998

URGENT NEWS: Nigerians can now earn in US Dollars from home, let’s show you how our client earned $13,000 (₦9,600,000.00) on a premium domain name within 2 weeks of acquisition. Click here

Advertisements

Supreme court clinches with Rivers in Buhari’s suit against S. 84 (12) of Electoral Act.

Advertisements

The Supreme Court has granted Rivers State’s request to join in President Muhammadu Buhari’s suit against Section 84 (12) of the Electoral Act.

Hearing in the suit has been fixed for May 26.

The Supreme Court fixed the date after joining Rivers State as an interested party.

Justice Muhammad Dattijo adjourned the matter following the concession by Buhari’s lawyer Lateef Fagbemi that the speaker, Rivers State House of Assembly and Attorney General, Rivers State, be joined as parties.

Advertisements

| RECOMMENDED


Advertisements

Section 84 (12)
President Buhari and the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) Abubakar Malami, had filed a suit at the Supreme Court, seeking an interpretation of Section 84(12) of the Electoral Amendment Act 2022.

In the suit filed on April 29, the President and AGF, who are the plaintiffs, listed the National Assembly as the sole defendant.

They are seeking an order of the apex court to strike out the section of the Electoral Act, saying it is inconsistent with the nation’s Constitution.

According to the court document, the plaintiffs contend that Section 84 (12) of the Electoral (Amendment) Act, 2022 is inconsistent with the provisions of Sections 42, 65, 66, 106, 107, 131, 137, 147, 151, 177, 182, 192 and 196 of the Constitution of Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, (as amended), as well as Article 2 of the African Charter on Human and People and Peoples Rights.

President Buhari and Malami also contended that the Constitution already provides qualification and disqualification for the offices of the President and Vice President, Governor and Deputy Governor, Senate and House of Representatives, House of Assembly, Ministers, Commissioners, and Special Advisers.



They urged the court to make: “A declaration that the joint and combined reading of Sections 65, 66, 106, 107, 131, 137, 147, 151, 177, 182, 192 and 196 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, (as amended); the provision of Section 84 (12) of the Electoral Act, 2022, which also ignores Section 84(3) of the same Act, is an additional qualifying and/or disqualifying factors for the National Assembly, House of Assembly, Gubernatorial and Presidential elections as enshrined in the said constitution, hence unconstitutional, unlawful, null and void.”

In the same vein, the National Assembly has asked the Supreme Court to strike out the suit instituted by President Buhari.

The National Assembly, in its counter-affidavit, filed by its lawyer, Kayode Ajulo, said the Supreme Court cannot be invoked to amend the provision of any law validity made by lawmakers in the exercise of their legislative powers as granted by the Constitution.

They argued that the 1999 Constitution, as amended gave the National Assembly the power to make laws for good governance in Nigeria

Advertisements

| RECENTLY ADDED

Advertisements

N96bn fraud: Court fixes May 27 for judgment in Amaechi’s suit.

Advertisements

The Supreme Court on Monday in Abuja fixed May 27 for judgment in a suit by former Rivers State governor, Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi, seeking to stop his probe in an alleged N96 billion fraud and fraudulent sales of valued assets belonging to Rivers State.

Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, who led a seven-man panel of Justices of the Court, announced the judgment date after taking arguments for and against the suit.



Amaechi, who is currently Minister of Transportation, is praying the apex court to prohibit Governor Nyesom Wike from investigating his eight-year tenure as the executive governor of the state.

Advertisements

The former governor, represented by Prince Lateef Fagbemi SAN, predicated his opposition to probe on the ground that it was aimed at witch-hunting him, to embarrass him, humiliate him and to as well disgrace him in view of his political differences with his successor.

Wike, who constituted a seven-man panel to probe his predecessor, however, is asking the Supreme Court to dismiss Amaechi’s suit.

Advertisements

The governor, represented by Emmanuel Ukala SAN, insisted that the Commission of Inquiry headed by Justice George Omekeji was to look into how N96 billion was allegedly withdrawn from the treasury of the state government and how it was expended.

Wike also said that the Commission of Inquiry was to look into the lawful or otherwise, sales of valuable assets of the state.

Get new content delivered directly to your inbox.

Join 5,917 other followers

The listed valuable assets are Omoku Gas Turbine, Afam Gas Turbine, Trans Amadi Gas Turbine, Eleme Gas Turbine, Olympia Hotel and the award of contract for the execution of MonoRail Project.

Amaechi’s suit at the High Court of Rivers State and Court of Appeal had earlier been dismissed prompting his move to the Supreme Court for remedy.

Advertisements

US Supreme Court loses 87 Year Old Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to death.

Advertisements

United States Supreme Court Justice and liberal icon Ruth Bader Ginsburg died Friday, opening a crucial vacancy on the high court expected to set off a pitched political battle at the peak of the presidential campaign.

Ginsburg, 87, died after a fight with pancreatic cancer, the court announced, saying she passed away “this evening surrounded by her family at her home in Washington, DC.”

Affectionately known as the Notorious RBG, Ginsburg was the oldest justice of nine on the Supreme Court.

She anchored its liberal faction, whittled to four by two appointments since 2017 from President Donald Trump.

Coming just 46 days before an election in which Trump lags his Democratic rival Joe Biden in the polls, the vacancy offers the Republican president a chance to solidly lock in a conservative majority at the court for decades to come.

Advertisements

That could lead to a court that would potentially limit abortion rights, strengthen the powers of business, and water down rights provided minorities and the LGBTQ community over the past three decades.

But Democrats are expected to fight tough to force a delay in her replacement until after the election — an uphill battle given the control Trump’s Republicans have on the Senate, which must approve any nominee.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was the anchor of the court’s liberal faction. MANDEL NGAN / AFP

– Fought for women’s rights –
Ginsburg, who was Jewish, was born in Brooklyn, New York in 1933.

A legal scholar and law professor, she had a deep history in jurisprudence of standing up for women’s rights.

Advertisements

She became only the second woman to serve as a Supreme Court Justice when she was appointed to the court in 1993 by president Bill Clinton.

“Our Nation has lost a jurist of historic stature. We at the Supreme Court have lost a cherished colleague,” Chief Justice John Roberts said in a statement.

“Today we mourn, but with confidence that future generations will remember Ruth Bader Ginsburg as we knew her — a tireless and resolute champion of justice.”

– Looming political fight –
There was no immediate comment on her death from the White House.

Advertisements

Speaking to a rally in Minnesota and apparently still unaware of the news, Trump reminded the crowd of the likelihood that a new term would allow him to appoint new justices.

“The next one will have anywhere from one to four” justices, he said. “Think of that, that will totally change” the landscape on core legal issues, including abortion, he said.

ABC News later reported, citing well-informed sources, that Trump will move quickly to name a replacement.

In a pitch to conservative voters earlier this month, he unveiled a long list of possible replacements for court vacancies, all of them deeply conservative, that he would tap if reelected.

Advertisements

Asked in August by radio host Hugh Hewitt if he would nominate a justice just before the election, Trump replied: “Absolutely, I’d do it.”

“I would move quickly. Why not? I mean they would. The Democrats would if they were in this position.”

Democrats were expected to fight hard to prevent a replacement from being named right away.

Ginsburg herself was acutely aware of the stakes of her health on the court balance, and her fans fretted at her increasingly frequent trips to the hospital over the past two years.

Advertisements

According to NPR radio, Ginsburg raised the issue this week with her granddaughter Clara Spera.

“My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed,” she said, according to Spera.

But Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said Friday he would move on any nominee from Trump, ignoring the precedent he set in 2016 in freezing Democratic President Barack Obama’s nominee to fill a vacancy before the election.

“President Trump’s nominee will receive a vote on the floor of the United States Senate,” McConnell said in a statement.


#Newsworthy…